|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
click on images to see other |
1 |
1905-06 |
2 |
1909 |
3 |
1911 |
4 |
1912 |
5 |
1913 |
6 |
1913 |
|
7 |
1915 |
|
8 |
1920 |
9 |
1930 |
10 |
1930 |
11 |
1932 |
12 |
1933 |
On observing these paintings in sequential order we see a predominantly horizontal space evoked by the boundless natural landscape (1 and 2) opposed to the measurable vertical development of human constructions, that is to say, artificial additions to nature (3), merging into a synthesis metaphorically expressed by the shape of a tree (4). |
![]() |
The relationship between horizontal and vertical which we see expressed in a rather univocal and static way in the naturalistic tree ( 4), multiplies (5) and takes on ever changing combinations during the Cubist phase (6). |
The changeable relationships between opposite drives find a more balanced and lasting situation in a square which is namely an equivalence of horizontal and vertical (7). |
![]() |
The juxtaposition that produces open and unstable situations elsewhere is transformed into interpenetration that generates harmony and permanence in that square. |
|
![]() |
One or more square proportions were to inform nearly all the works produced by Mondrian after 1920 (8, 9, 10, 11,12). |
Mondrian endeavors in these paintings to present space poised in unstable equilibrium between a constant parameter (the square proportion) and a variable set of measurements and/or colors. |